CLINGING TO OBJECTIFICATION: BODY IMAGE CONTROL AND PROBLEMATIC INTERNET USE AS DETERMINANTS OF OBJECTIFIED BODY CONSCIOUSNESS AMONG FEMALE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN MULTAN

Authors

  • Momina Hameed M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Sociology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan
  • Tehmina Sattar Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan
  • Ismat Nasim Assistant Professor of Economics, The Emerson University, Multan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59075/jsrd.v7i6.531

Keywords:

Body image control, Problematic internet usage, Body shaming, Body surveillance, Objectified body consciousness

Abstract

This research investigated the underlying dynamics of intensified self-objectification among young, educated female university students. A quantitative research design was used to collect data from N=378 female university students. The tool was designed by deductively deriving indicators from objectification theory and was further analyzed using SPSS version 21. Means, standard deviations, and hierarchical linear regression were used to examine the relationship among the study variables. The analysis showed that demographic variables, including age, currently enrolled educational program, family size, and family type, were significant and positively associated with objectified body consciousness of female students. Furthermore, body image control and problematic internet usage explained 27% of the variance in defining the objectified body consciousness among the female university students. Increasing media literacy, conducting awareness sessions, and providing psychological support can reduce young students’ focus on their physical appearance.

Downloads

Details

    Abstract Views: 19
    PDF Downloads: 17

Published

14-08-2026

How to Cite

Momina Hameed, Tehmina Sattar, & Ismat Nasim. (2026). CLINGING TO OBJECTIFICATION: BODY IMAGE CONTROL AND PROBLEMATIC INTERNET USE AS DETERMINANTS OF OBJECTIFIED BODY CONSCIOUSNESS AMONG FEMALE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN MULTAN. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT, 7(6), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.59075/jsrd.v7i6.531